IVDR

Subscribe to IVDR via RSS

This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during September and early October 2024 from the United Kingdom and European Union.

Guidance on AI continues to be published. In the EU, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has published its Reflection Paper on the use of AI throughout the medicines life cycle. In the UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) opened applications for its AI Airlock, a regulatory sandbox for AI as Medical Devices. And over 100 companies have signed up to join the EU AI Pact, a voluntary initiative to encourage companies to comply with the AI Act before the statutory deadlines. These guidance documents and initiatives provide companies with much greater clarity on how the authorities will regulate the use of AI in health care.

Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – October 2024

On 23 October 2024, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the urgent need to revise the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR).

This resolution acknowledges that the MDR and IVDR were adopted to strengthen the regulatory framework for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the EU, to ensure higher standards of safety, transparency and clinical performance, while also fostering innovation in the sector. However, it is also acknowledges that significant challenges have been encountered in implementing the MDR and the IVDR. These include delays, shortages, and difficulties in navigating the regulatory procedures. The particular impact on small and medium sized enterprises (SME) and on patient care are highlighted.

The lack of harmonised procedures for Notified Bodies, and the lack of harmonised interpretation of the MDR and IVDR between Notified Bodies, is also noted, and the fact that this leads to unpredictable timelines for certification and market access.

The Parliament resolution therefore seeks to address some of these difficulties.

Continue Reading European Parliament resolution on need to revise the Medical Devices Regulation

This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during August and early September 2024 from United Kingdom, and European Union.

There have been some important reimbursement updates this month. In France, the French health regulator has issued a negative opinion on the first digital therapeutic that sought reimbursement through the PECAN pathway. This opinion suggests that while PECAN provides a more streamlined process by not requiring formal clinical trials, the regulator still expects robust data to show that the digital therapeutic is worthy of reimbursement. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has published a position paper that highlights the risks of using AI for generating and reporting evidence for health technology assessments. It sets out that the use of AI in this context should be limited to situations where the value of doing so can be clearly demonstrated, and sets out guidance for companies on how to present such data and to justify the use of AI. Health technology assessment seems to be an area where AI has more readily been accepted, and industry will welcome guidance on the parameters around such use.

Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – September 2024

In our recent blog post, we reviewed the overall impact of the new EU AI Act on the life sciences industry. The AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), which entered into force on 1 August 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive law regulating artificial intelligence (AI). While some provisions are already applicable, the provisions relating to high risk AI systems, which are those most likely to impact the life sciences industry, will apply from 2 August 2027.

Continue Reading The European AI office and other resources relevant to high risk AI systems

This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during July and early August 2024  from United Kingdom, and European Union.

Following the UK national elections on July 4, 2024, which brought in a new government, the King delivered a speech to Parliament setting out the government’s key legislative and policy agenda. Of particular importance to the life sciences sector are the Product Safety and Metrology Bill and the Digital Information and Smart Data Bill. Although the scope and content of each bill is currently unknown, they could impact medical devices and innovative scientific research. Further, there was no artificial intelligence bill in the agenda, although the government will “seek to establish the appropriate legislation” in the future.

Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – August 2024

Much has been written about the EU AI Act, which has now been published in the Official Journal as Regulation (EU) 2024/1689  and entered into force on 1 August 2024.

The AI Act is so-called “horizontal legislation”, meaning it applies across industries, and its impact will be felt from agriculture to aerospace and beyond. …

In our previous blog post, we set out the Commission’s proposed amendments to the Medical Devices Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulations (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR). The new Regulation introducing these changes has now been published: Regulation (EU) 2024/1860.

The new Regulation includes a welcome extension to the transitional periods for certain IVDs under the IVDR, where applicable conditions have been met. The other proposals relate to a gradual roll-out of Eudamed and notification obligations for interruptions in supply.

Continue Reading Transition periods under the IVDR extended

On 6 May 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published its highly anticipated final rule, revising the regulatory definition of an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) to explicitly capture IVDs manufactured by laboratories (known as laboratory developed tests or LDTs).

Historically, FDA exercised enforcement discretion for LDTs, declining to impose its device authority over such tests in most instances. Under the new final rule, LDT manufacturers that generally operated outside FDA oversight will now be expected to come into compliance with FDA requirements and controls applicable to their tests. In consideration of this substantial operational and compliance burden, the preamble to the final rule details a phaseout policy under which FDA will gradually end its general LDT enforcement discretion policy in five phases over a four-year period, as follows:

Continue Reading What you need to know about the FDA Laboratory Developed Test Final Rule

This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during February 2024.

Of note, the UK continues to pursue a “pro innovation” flexible approach to the regulation of AI. As outlined in the UK government’s response to the public consultation, the government will develop a set of core principles for regulating AI, while leaving regulatory authorities, like the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), discretion over how the principles apply in their respective sectors. A central governmental function will coordinate regulation across sectors and encourage collaboration. The government’s aim with this approach is to enable the UK to remain flexible to address the changing AI landscape, while being robust enough to address key concerns. This is in sharp contrast to the position in the EU, where the EU AI Act is reaching the conclusion of the legislative process.

Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest, March 2024