UK Law

Subscribe to UK Law via RSS

2025 promises to be a year of further advancements in the UK’s life sciences sector and one important area of on-going development is the regulation of clinical trials.

After some delay, the much anticipated Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (the new Regulations) were laid before Parliament on 12 December 2024, intended to amend the current UK framework governing clinical trials. This has been described as the “biggest overhaul of the clinical trial regulations in 20 years”, and is intended to cement the UK as a worldclass destination for conducting international clinical trials, to “support [a] more streamlined and flexible regulation of clinical trials, removing unnecessary administrative burdens on trial sponsors, whilst protecting the interests of trial participants.”

Key changes proposed by the new Regulations are discussed below. While certain regulatory requirements will be set out in the legislation, the aim is to move away from a “one-size-fits-all” approach, allowing for a more proactive response to innovation. This is in line with the new streamlined notification scheme for lowest risk clinical trials, which the MHRA introduced in October 2023, as discussed in our previous blog post. As such, the new Regulations have been described as “as future-proof as possible and […] responsive to different types of trials and innovative ways of carrying out trials.”

The new Regulation will be debated in Parliament in early 2025 and, after a 12 month implementation period, the aim is for the new Regulations to come into force in early 2026. In addition, guidance, which is already under development, will be used for specific details, rather than the new Regulations being too granular and prescriptive. The aim is for the guidance to become ‘live’ in January 2026, to coincide with the new Regulations.  Continue Reading New Year Update: incoming changes to UK regulation of clinical trials

On January 1, 2025, new UK-wide arrangements for the supply of medicines came into effect on account of the “Windsor Framework.” The overarching aim is to secure the long-term stability of the supply of medicines to Northern Ireland (NI), ensuring that medicines will be available at the same time, and on the same basis, across…

Following the implementation of the Windsor Agreement, a new framework is coming into effect in the new year affecting the UK licensing regime for medicinal products, giving the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) the exclusive authority to licence medicines across the whole of the UK.  The changes to the UK licensing regime will have knock-on effects on the Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) framework. To accommodate for this, The Supplementary Protection Certificates (Amendments Relating to the Windsor Framework) Regulations 2024 (the Windsor Framework SPC Regulations) were laid before Parliament on 31 October 2024 to come into force on 1 January 2025. This will amend the existing assimilated Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 as it applies in the UK.

Although the UK SPC application process will eventually be simplified, the Windsor Framework SPC Regulations insert new definitions and additional provisions, as well as an Annex setting out transitional arrangements to address issues relating to territorial scope, validity, duration, expiry and paediatric extensions.Continue Reading Windsor Agreement changes to UK Assimilated SPC Regulation

Following the outcome of the national election on 4 July 2024, on 17 July 2024, King Charles III gave a speech to the UK Parliament in which, as directed by the new Government, he outlined the key points of its legislative and policy agenda.

The agenda includes a Product Safety and Metrology Bill.  Some form of legislation to address UK product regulation was expected in order to take account of market developments and new technologies, such as online selling and AI.  We set out below a brief summary of the Bill.Continue Reading The King’s Speech: Product Safety and Metrology Bill

In the UK General Election on 4 July, the Labour Party won 412 of the 650 seats, giving it a comfortable majority. Its leader, Sir Keir Starmer, became Prime Minister, meaning a change of government from Conversative to Labour for the first time in 14 years.

In its campaign, Labour focused on the need to deliver economic growth and innovation in critical industry sectors. It also placed considerable emphasis on addressing the problems facing the National Health Service (NHS), such as long waiting lists for treatment, old equipment and an increasingly ageing population.

The government’s economic priorities were further set out in the first major speech delivered by the new Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves on 8 July, in which she said that growth “is now our national mission”. The Health Secretary Wes Streeting also noted his intention of making the Department of Health and Social Care a department for economic growth. While each of these are statements of intent and not binding on the new government, they provide valuable insight into what industry can expect over the next 5 years. We set out below some of the most relevant initiatives that could impact the industry.Continue Reading What does the new UK government mean for life sciences?

On 15 May 2024, the Court of Appeal (CoA) handed down a unanimous judgment that a medical device manufacturer could not obtain interim relief to prevent its UK Approved Body (UKAB), BSI, suspending a certificate on grounds of safety and non-conformities before a substantive decision in the manufacturer’s judicial review claim. The judgment overturns the first instance decision granting the manufacturer an injunction and mandatory order against BSI.

The CoA judgment emphasises courts’ deference to expert regulators, particularly in matters of public health, and that courts are unwilling to restrain a public authority in exercising its powers in good faith, particularly when there is an argument concerning public health. The judgment also reaffirms the principle that the burden is on the manufacturer to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the UKAB the safety and performance of a device. Given this is the first decided case challenging the decision of an Approved Body, there are a number of implications for the UK framework and the relationship with the EU.Continue Reading Court of Appeal rules on suspension of UKCA certificates

A version of this article was first published in Life Sciences IP Review

There is currently no specific legislation in the UK that governs AI, or its use in healthcare. Instead, a number of general-purpose laws apply that have to be adapted to specific AI technologies. As a step towards a more coherent approach, the government recently published its response to its consultation on regulating AI in the UK.  This maintains the government’s “pro-innovation” framework of principles, to be set out in guidance rather than legislation, which will then be implemented by regulatory authorities in their respective sectors, such as by the MHRA for medicines.  The MHRA has already started this process and signalled itself as an early-adopter of the UK government’s approach. The hope is that this will lead to investment in the UK by life science companies as the UK is seen as a first-launch country for innovative technologies.Continue Reading The UK’s pro-innovation approach to AI: What does this mean for life science companies?

At the beginning of July, the MHRA published its 2023 – 2026 Corporate Plan, which highlights, amongst many other topics, the importance of introducing new legislation and guidance on clinical trials in the UK to help provide the “stable and predictable regulatory environment that companies require”. The intention is that by 31 March 2026, the MHRA will implement a revised regulatory framework for clinical trials.

Work on a new clinical trial framework is already underway. On 21 March 2023, the MHRA published its response to the UK consultation (which ran from 17 January to 14 March 2022) on legislative proposals for changes to the law governing clinical trials, namely the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004.

Responses demonstrated strong support to update and improve the legislation governing clinical trials, with most respondents agreeing that patient safety should remain the focus of the legislation, but with a more flexible and risk proportionate approach to decision-making. In line with responses to other recent consultations, the MHRA is looking to align with international standards rather than be limited by alignment with the EU. It is hoped that the implementation of the proposals will make it easier and more efficient to run trials in the UK, enabling greater patient access to new, safe and life-changing treatments, while retaining the UK as an attractive place for trials.

In terms of next steps, the drafting of the statutory instrument to update the clinical trials legislation is expected to be laid before parliament in the Autumn of 2023. Comprehensive guidance will also accompany the legislation.Continue Reading Legislative change is afoot for clinical trials conducted in the UK

The Retained EU Law Bill is now an Act of Parliament, having received Royal Assent on 29 June 2023. In our blog, published at the end of last year, we explained the draft Bill’s key features. Since then, the Bill has undergone significant amendment. In this blog we consider key differences between the original Bill and the Act.Continue Reading The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 – Update

The procurement landscape in the UK is due to change next year. A draft procurement bill (Bill) seeks to consolidate a number of different procurement regulations that originate from EU legislation, including the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR), into a single revised regime. The aim is to modernise and unify procurement systems and processes into a single piece of legislation and to develop the regime specifically for England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

In addition to the Bill, a proposed Provider Selection Regime, introduced by regulations made under the Health and Care Act 2022, will create a new set of rules for arranging healthcare services in England, and take NHS healthcare services outside the scope of the Bill. That said, some services of relevance to the NHS may still fall under the Bill, in particular, the procurement of goods and medicines.

The aim of both the proposed Bill and the Provider Selection Regime is to give more flexibility to procurers to adapt the procurement process to the services and goods being procured, and to make it easier for the most suitable bidders to win the bid, while at the same time maintaining transparency. Neither the Bill nor the Provider Selection Regime apply in Scotland given that these are devolved matters and the pre-existing regime will remain in place there. Since the existing procurement regime originated in European law, there is currently little, if any, divergence between Scotland and the rest of the UK. The new changes will bring about the potential for divergence.

In this post, we have set out some key takeaways about the new procurement regime under the Bill and the proposed Provider Selection Regime.
Continue Reading Adoption of New Procurement Regulations in the UK