On 23 October 2024, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the urgent need to revise the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR).

This resolution acknowledges that the MDR and IVDR were adopted to strengthen the regulatory framework for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the EU, to ensure higher standards of safety, transparency and clinical performance, while also fostering innovation in the sector. However, it is also acknowledges that significant challenges have been encountered in implementing the MDR and the IVDR. These include delays, shortages, and difficulties in navigating the regulatory procedures. The particular impact on small and medium sized enterprises (SME) and on patient care are highlighted.

The lack of harmonised procedures for Notified Bodies, and the lack of harmonised interpretation of the MDR and IVDR between Notified Bodies, is also noted, and the fact that this leads to unpredictable timelines for certification and market access.

The Parliament resolution therefore seeks to address some of these difficulties.

Continue Reading European Parliament resolution on need to revise the Medical Devices Regulation

On October 11, 2024, the Chinese State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR, 国家市场监督管理总局) issued the Draft Compliance Guidelines for Healthcare Companies to Prevent Commercial Bribery Risks (the Draft Guidelines, 医药企业防范商业贿赂风险合规指引). These Draft Guidelines were published for public comment, due by Sunday, October 20, 2024. While China’s public comment system is still developing, the Draft Guidelines provide valuable insight into regulators’ views and expectations. We have prepared informal translations of the Draft Guidelines and their related Drafting Statement which provides additional background.

We believe these Draft Guidelines, once effective, will play a vital role in the development of compliance programs for China’s healthcare companies. For questions on this or any other subject, please reach out to the authors or any of their colleagues in Arnold & Porter’s White Collar Defense & Investigations practice group.

Read our Advisory for an overview of the Draft Guidelines, including informal English translations of the Draft Guidelines and their related Drafting Statement, which provides additional background.

On 8 October 2024, the UK government launched the new Regulatory Innovation Office (RIO), which aims to “reduce the burden of red tape” faced by businesses when bringing innovations to market, including artificial intelligence (AI) healthcare technologies and engineering biology products such as vaccines and cultivated meat.

The RIO, established within the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology, will seek to reshape regulatory landscapes by working with existing regulators to accelerate approvals, bring regulations up to date and facilitate inter-regulator collaboration. The creation of the RIO is a key manifesto commitment, as part of the government’s wider mission to kickstart economic growth, aiming to provide regulatory certainty and reduce unnecessary delays.

Continue Reading UK government launches new Regulatory Innovation Office to reduce red tape

Earlier this week, the EMA published its Reflection paper on the use of AI in the medicinal product life cycle. As set out in our previous blog post, the EMA’s draft reflection paper was published for consultation in July 2023, and following many months of review of the feedback collected from the relevant stakeholders, the Paper has now been published.  The Paper reflects the views of the EMA on the use of AI from drug discovery and non-clinical development, to clinical trials, manufacturing and post-authorisation. The Paper recognises the utility of AI in digital transformation and notes new risks that need to be mitigated to ensure patient safety and data integrity.

Continue Reading EMA adopts reflection paper on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

On 23 September 2024, the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) and the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) published an updated Code of Practice for the pharmaceutical industry. Following an extensive consultation with over 3,000 comments, ABPI has announced that the new “orange” 2024 Code amends the previous 2021 Code in three key areas: the PMCPA constitution and procedure; the provision of prescribing information; and certain elements of the Code moving from guidance to mandatory requirements. However, there are also interesting amendments to the requirement to maintain high standards and obligation to seek a lawful basis for disclosure of transfers of value to an individual.

ABPI has said that the new Code seeks to “raise the high standards expected of pharmaceutical companies even further while also ensuring that complaints can be resolved quicker”.

Continue Reading A New 2024 Code for the British Pharmaceutical Industry  – “The Future is Orange”

This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during August and early September 2024 from United Kingdom, and European Union.

There have been some important reimbursement updates this month. In France, the French health regulator has issued a negative opinion on the first digital therapeutic that sought reimbursement through the PECAN pathway. This opinion suggests that while PECAN provides a more streamlined process by not requiring formal clinical trials, the regulator still expects robust data to show that the digital therapeutic is worthy of reimbursement. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has published a position paper that highlights the risks of using AI for generating and reporting evidence for health technology assessments. It sets out that the use of AI in this context should be limited to situations where the value of doing so can be clearly demonstrated, and sets out guidance for companies on how to present such data and to justify the use of AI. Health technology assessment seems to be an area where AI has more readily been accepted, and industry will welcome guidance on the parameters around such use.

Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – September 2024

On 5 September 2024, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Heads of Medicine Agencies (HMA) published a guidance document (the Guidance) with general principles and recommendations on the use of large language models (LLMs) in regulatory science and the regulation of medicinal products.  The guiding principles for users are also summarised in a one-page factsheet.

While the Guidance is aimed at the European Union (EU) regulatory authorities, it is instructive for companies active in the Life Sciences sector. It provides useful insight into how regulators will approach the use of LLMs in their regulatory activities, the risks they have identified and how these risks can be mitigated.

The development of the guiding principles set out in the Guidance are part of the EMA’s and HMA’s multiannual AI workplan to 2028 and, according to EMA, will be subject to regular future updates.

Continue Reading AI: EMA publishes guiding principles on the use of large language models (LLMs)

In our recent blog post, we reviewed the overall impact of the new EU AI Act on the life sciences industry. The AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), which entered into force on 1 August 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive law regulating artificial intelligence (AI). While some provisions are already applicable, the provisions relating to high risk AI systems, which are those most likely to impact the life sciences industry, will apply from 2 August 2027.

Continue Reading The European AI office and other resources relevant to high risk AI systems

This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during July and early August 2024  from United Kingdom, and European Union.

Following the UK national elections on July 4, 2024, which brought in a new government, the King delivered a speech to Parliament setting out the government’s key legislative and policy agenda. Of particular importance to the life sciences sector are the Product Safety and Metrology Bill and the Digital Information and Smart Data Bill. Although the scope and content of each bill is currently unknown, they could impact medical devices and innovative scientific research. Further, there was no artificial intelligence bill in the agenda, although the government will “seek to establish the appropriate legislation” in the future.

Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – August 2024

Much has been written about the EU AI Act, which has now been published in the Official Journal as Regulation (EU) 2024/1689  and entered into force on 1 August 2024.

The AI Act is so-called “horizontal legislation”, meaning it applies across industries, and its impact will be felt from agriculture to aerospace and beyond.  We are pleased to contribute an expert chapter in The International Comparative Legal Guide on the application of the AI Act to the life sciences industries, with a particular focus on the regulatory framework for so-called “High Risk AI Systems”, given the significant impact this will have on AI medical devices.

We discuss what is an AI system, when the AI Act will apply, and focus on when medical devices will be regulated as High Risk AI Systems and the associated obligations on the “provider” who is placing the AI system on the market, as well as “deployers” who use AI systems in a professional capacity. There are also some interesting questions on when pre-marketing testing can be conducted, and of course the overlap between the medical devices and new AI regimes. Finally, we set out some points that life sciences companies should consider as they prepare for the implementation of the AI Act. Do let us know if you would like to discuss further!