Regulation

Subscribe to Regulation via RSS

On 12 December 2025, the European Commission published a draft Implementing Regulation (“the Regulation”) on certain uniform quality management and procedural requirements for the conformity assessment activities carried out by Notified Bodies (“NBs”), introducing detailed requirements for NBs operating under the Medical Device Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (“MDR”) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulations (EU) 2017/746 (“IVDR”).

The recitals describe serious systemic challenges that have emerged since the implementation of the MDR/IVDR and the proposals aim to set out a structured resolution to these challenges. An overview of these proposals is set out below. Overall, the Regulation aims to create a harmonised NB landscape that is predictable, transparent, and fair – supporting patient safety while easing unnecessary administrative burdens for manufacturers. Whether this goes far enough to address the challenges identified will have to be seen.

The Regulation is open for public consultation until 23 January 2026. Once feedback has been reviewed by the Commission, it will be published. The Commission  anticipates adoption of the Regulations in the first quarter of 2026, following which it will be sent to the European Parliament and Council for consideration. The timing of the formal adoption of the Regulation is not yet clear.Continue Reading A Deep Dive into the EU’s New Implementing Regulation for Notified Bodies

A new policy paper released on 2 November 2025 sets out the MHRA’s proposals on overhauling and transforming the UK regulation of rare therapies.

The intention is for a “bold new rulebook for rare therapies” to be published in 2026. Rare therapies is defined as medicinal products intended to treat rare diseases, specifically, conditions with a prevalence of no more than 5 in 10,000. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)’s press release on the matter provides the concerning statistic that, while ≈3.5 million people in UK are affected by rare diseases (equivalent to one child in every classroom), and many more if carers are taken into account, only 5% of rare diseases have approved treatment. An intention of the reform is therefore to shorten the time for development of therapies for such conditions from initial discovery through to the stage of delivery to patients.

The MHRA aims to position the UK as a global leader in developing, regulating, and integrating rare therapies into healthcare. This policy paper outlines a new regulatory framework designed to accelerate access to innovative treatments for rare diseases while maintaining safety and evidence standards.

The initiative is supported by the newly formed Rare Disease Consortium, a collaborative effort made up of various different stakeholders including the MHRA, NICE, DHSC, NHS England, as well as patients and their representatives, academia and research institutions and industry.

A draft of the framework is anticipated to be available by Spring 2026, with external review in the first half of the year. A public consultation will also be conducted in 2026.Continue Reading Rewriting the Rulebook: MHRA’s Vision for Rare Disease Therapies

Article 22 and the Pharma Context

Competition authorities in Europe have for years grown increasingly concerned about so-called “killer acquisitions,” particularly in life sciences where targets often have high innovation potential but little or no turnover. These are transactions where the acquired company’s competitive significance lies in its pipeline, R&D or intellectual property rather than its financials. Such deals can escape traditional turnover-based merger control thresholds, yet – the authorities argue – may still raise serious concerns about future (i.e., potential) competition and innovation. That said, the label “killer acquisition” is something of a misnomer. In practice, transactions undertaken solely to eliminate innovation from a smaller rival are exceedingly rare.

To address this risk, the European Commission has encouraged greater use of Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR), which allows Member States to refer cases for EU review even if they do not meet EU thresholds. Subject to potential further developments, two recent judgments, the Court of Justice’s ruling in Illumina/GRAIL and the General Court’s decision in Brasserie Nationale, now provide the leading interpretation of how Article 22 operates in practice, particularly in relation to call-in powers and timing of referrals.Continue Reading Article 22 Trends in Pharma M&A: Call-In Powers and Timing

The European Commission has published new Guidelines on the details of the various categories of variations (to the terms of marketing authorisations (“MA”) for medicinal products) (“Variations Guidelines”).

The new 2025 Variations Guidelines replace the older 2013 Variation Guidelines, and support the implementation of the amended Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 (“Variations Regulation”) (see our BioSlice blog post), which entered into force in January 2025. The Variations Guidelines provide detailed guidance for marketing authorisation holders (“MAH”) on modifying and updating their MAs, the procedures to follow and the related requirements.

Overall, the new Guidelines provide greater flexibility and clarity in certain aspects of the variation procedures. At the same time, they introduce new obligations for MAHs that should be taken into account by pharmaceutical companies going forward.

In this blog, we highlight some of the key changes introduced by the Variations Guidelines.Continue Reading European Commission Publishes New Variation Guidelines for Medicines

On January 1, 2025, new UK-wide arrangements for the supply of medicines came into effect on account of the “Windsor Framework.” The overarching aim is to secure the long-term stability of the supply of medicines to Northern Ireland (NI), ensuring that medicines will be available at the same time, and on the same basis, across…

On 22 February 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) announced that it was issuing a proposed rule to align the Agency’s current Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements for medical devices, codified at 21 C.F.R. Part 820 and known as the Quality System Regulation, with the international consensus standard ISO 13485:2016 (the ISO). This reflects a years-long effort by the Agency to better harmonise the U.S. requirements with that of many foreign regulators. For example, in the European Union, the ISO is listed in the EU legislation, meaning that a medical device that conforms to this standard is presumed to be in conformity with the EU regulatory requirements on quality management systems for medical devices. This harmonisation should, therefore, provide some consistency between jurisdictions and enable companies to streamline their processes between countries.
Continue Reading Harmonisation of international rules on medical device quality management systems

At the end of 2020, the European Commission set out its vision to build a European Health Union with its announcement of the new pharmaceutical strategy for Europe (the new Strategy). As we discussed in a previous blog, the new Strategy seeks to introduce new policies and ideas, whilst bringing into the spotlight long standing challenges which were exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic. The new Strategy puts forward numerous proposals for legislative reforms that are likely to affect the regulation of the entire life cycle of a medicinal product and the regulation of medical devices. As a reminder, the key elements of the new Strategy relate to innovation, availability, accessibility, affordability, and supply of medicinal products.

In this post, we focus on the developments in the first half of 2021, including a pilot project launched by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on market access and the Commission’s Roadmap on revisions to the pharmaceutical legislation.Continue Reading Update on the European Commission’s proposed new pharmaceutical strategy

As part of its vision to build a European Health Union, the European Commission announced the new pharmaceutical strategy for Europe (the new Strategy) on 25 November 2020. The new Strategy introduces new policies and ideas but also brings into the spotlight long standing challenges which were recently exacerbated by the coronavirus outbreak. The new Strategy puts forward numerous proposals for legislative reforms that are likely to affect the regulation of the entire life cycle of a medicinal product. Some of these revisions also affect the regulation of medical devices. The main elements of the new Strategy relate to innovation, availability, accessibility, affordability, and supply in relation to medicinal products.

In this post, we focus on the key proposed regulatory changes expected to impact the pharmaceutical industry. The post also discusses the implications of the new Strategy from the EU competition law perspective.

Continue Reading European Commission proposes a new pharmaceutical strategy for Europe

As part of the strategy to fight COVID-19, the European Commission has proposed a Regulation to facilitate the conduct of clinical trials using medicinal products containing or consisting of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).

The European Commission recognises that the applicable regulatory framework in relation to GMOs is unable to adequately address the challenges created by the pandemic. While some vaccines in development contain attenuated viruses or live vectors, which may fall within the definition of a GMO, there is uncertainty on the interactions between the GMO regulatory framework and the legislation on clinical trials and medicinal products. This is further aggravated by the absence of a common approach by the EU Member States.
Continue Reading The European Commission proposes a Regulation for COVID-19 clinical trials conducted with medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs