Welcome to the latest installment of Arnold & Porter’s Virtual and Digital Health Digest. This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during June and early July 2025 from the United Kingdom and European Union.

There has been a flurry of new guidance from the Medical Device Coordination Group this month, including guidance on classification of medical device software, on supply of software apps through online platform such as the App Store and Google Play, and on the interaction between the Medical Device Regulation and the EU AI Act. These are welcome guidance documents to provide important clarification for manufacturers as they develop software medical devices, although the guidance documents inevitably cannot cover every situation and leave some questions unanswered. Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – July 2025

The revised MDCG 2019-11 guidance on qualification and classification of software (the Revised Guidance)  introduces a series of clarifications and expansions that impact how software is qualified and classified as a medical device under the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). While the core principles remain unchanged, the Revised Guidance provides more detailed examples, specifically includes software using artificial intelligence (AI), and addresses modular software and interoperability with electronic health records (EHRs) under the European Health Data Space (EHDS).

This blog post outlines these key updates and considers their potential impact on compliance obligations for software manufacturers.Continue Reading Revised guidance on classification of Medical Device Software in the EU

The recently published MDCG 2025-4 guidance provides important clarifications on how Medical Device Software (MDSW) apps should be made available via online platforms and on the role of these online platforms. With digital distribution channels such as the App Store and Google Play playing a central role in healthcare software deployment, the guidance has significant implications for medical device manufacturers operating in the EU.

In essence, the guidance clarifies that digital distribution does not reduce regulatory obligations. Software-based medical devices must be subject to the same level of regulatory scrutiny and compliance as traditional, physical devices.

We set out below some comments on the distinction between platforms acting as intermediary service providers under the Digital Services Act (DSA) and those that may qualify as importers or distributors under the EU Medical Devices Regulations (the MDR and IVDR).Continue Reading EU Medical Device Software: New guidance on placing software medical devices on the EU market

On 13 June 2025, the European Commission launched the first phase of a pilot project under its COMBINE programme (the pilot project), aiming to streamline the authorisation process for combined studies involving both clinical trials of medicinal products and performance studies of in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD) (referred to as combined studies below).

The pilot project represents a significant step towards addressing the complex and fragmented regulatory landscape that sponsors currently face when submitting applications for combined studies across multiple EU countries. Although its practical effectiveness remains to be seen, the pilot project represents a positive development that should facilitate the approval of combined studies in the EU.

The pilot project is the first initiative under the COMBINE programme, with additional projects planned to launch in the coming years.Continue Reading European Commission launches COMBINE pilot to streamline approval of studies involving medicinal products and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

On 16 June 2025, the UK Medical Devices (Post-market Surveillance Requirements) (Amendment) (Great Britain) Regulations 2024 came into force, marking the first step in the reform of the UK legislation for medical devices. The regulations apply to Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland), and medical devices placed on the market in Northern Ireland must follow

 In our blog in December 2024, we provided an update on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) final rule, revising the regulatory definition of an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) to explicitly capture IVDs manufactured by laboratories (known as laboratory developed tests or LDTs). We noted that two cases had been filed challenging the

Welcome to the latest installment of Arnold & Porter’s Virtual and Digital Health Digest. This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during February and early March 2025 from the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been the focus this month, with certain aspects of the EU AI Act now in force and key guidance being published by the European Commission. In addition, the much criticized AI Liability Directive has been withdrawn by the European Commission. In the UK, the UK government published its AI Action Plan setting out its proportionate, flexible regulatory approach towards AI, and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) hosted an Innovation Showcase demonstrating how it is using digital technologies and AI throughout the regulatory lifecycle. Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – March 2025

We recently published this Advisory for our US clients, but thought it may be a useful reminder for UK and EU teams given the number of updates in this area.

We are sure that you are aware that the European Union (EU) medical devices framework has been subject to significant changes over recent years. However, implementation of the new rules has been problematic since the beginning, as both the industry and the EU institutions, national authorities, and notified bodies have found it difficult to adapt to the stricter and demanding new legal requirements. There are ongoing delays in companies obtaining CE marks under the new regime, criticism that the rules are stifling innovation, and concerns about the impact on patients.

Given the calls for change, criticism, and ongoing consultations, this Advisory sets out the current status of developments and what is important to know when seeking to do business in the EU.Continue Reading EU Medical Devices Legislation: What You Need To Know Given Latest Developments and Ongoing Challenges

On 6 February 2025, EU Member States announced the launch of a new pilot scheme for coordinated assessment of clinical investigations of medical devices (CI) and performance studies for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices (PS). Supported by the European Commission, the pilot allows sponsors to submit a single CI or PS application for review across multiple Member States, rather than each Member State conducting independent standalone reviews. The pilot scheme aims to make the application process for multi-national CI and PS more efficient and to reduce the duplication of activities by both the sponsor and competent authorities. As this has been a major cause of delays and complications in conducting CIs, this pilot will be welcomed by industry.Continue Reading EU announces pilot coordinated assessment for clinical investigations of medical devices

Welcome to the latest installment of Arnold & Porter’s Virtual and Digital Health Digest. This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during January and early February 2025 from the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union.

In this issue, we discuss some useful international guidance documents from the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). These include Guiding Principles on Good Machine Learning Practices (GMLP) that build on the principles previously set out by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and Health Canada, and guidance on characterization and risks of medical device software. The continued development of international guidance in this area highlights the importance of coordination between regulatory authorities and standardized guidance for these products. There have also been important developments in ongoing litigation relating to digital technologies, although whether these developments provide clear guidance to manufacturers remains to be seen.Continue Reading Virtual and Digital Health Digest – February 2025