Marketing Authorisation

Subscribe to Marketing Authorisation via RSS

On 23 October 2025, Advocate General (“AG”) Emiliou delivered his opinion in Case C-118/24: Laboratoires Eurogenerics and Theramex France.[1]

The AG opines on three key questions regarding the use of the decentralised procedure for generic medicinal products:

(i) The national courts of the EU Member States are allowed by EU law to judicially review the legality of a marketing authorisation (“MA”) granted via the decentralised abridged procedure where it is alleged that the medicinal product in question does not meet the criteria of a generic medicinal product. This is applies even if the judicial review is conducted by a national court in an EU Member State other that the reference Member State for the decentralised marketing authorisation procedure.

(ii) The applicant seeking such judicial review does not need to be the marketing authorisation holder for the reference medicinal product or the applicant for the generic marketing authorisation. The applicant could also be a third party with a vested interest, such as the marketing authorisation holder for a biosimilar medicinal product which will be competing with the newly authorised generic medicinal product. This conclusion by the AG remains unaffected by the fact that such applicant  may not be admissible if the action was brought at EU level to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) if the direct and individual concern of the applicant is not demonstrated. According to the AG, it is for the EU Member States in the framework of their procedural autonomy to decide whether a right to challenge an MA exists in these circumstances.

(iii) Chemically synthesised products are not precluded from meeting the criteria to be a generic of a reference biological medicinal product.

This third finding will, if followed by the CJEU, also apply to the centralised marketing authorisation procedure and arguably facilitate market access for synthetic copies of biological medicinal products. It would mean that, in practice, applicants for generics of biological medicinal products would not be required to submit additional pre-clinical and/or clinical data (as opposed to biosimilar applicants) and may potentially benefit, once authorised, from more advantageous pricing and reimbursement conditions (e.g., substitutability at pharmacy level which may not be available for biosimilar medicinal products).Continue Reading Can a chemically synthesised medicine be authorised as a generic of a biological medicine? And who can challenge this?

Introduction

On 4 June, EU Member States, meeting in the Council of the European Union (‘Council’), have agreed on a position on the pharmaceutical reform package.

This agreement was reached despite significant divergences between EU Member States in the preceding weeks. It marks a key milestone in the process for adoption of the EU revision of EU’s general pharmaceutical legislation, as it sets out the Council’s position for the trilogue negotiations to find a text agreeable to the Parliament and the Council, which can now begin.

The innovative pharmaceutical industry will welcome aspects of the Council’s adopted negotiating mandate as it provides greater certainty with regards to regulatory data protection and it lightens some of the obligations introduced in the European Commission proposal for reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation adopted in April 2023 and the European Parliament’s position adopted on 10 April 2024 (see our detailed advisory). At the same time, the Council has adopted positions on some aspects of the proposals that could be seen as less favourable to industry.

We discuss some of the key provisions and changes in the Council’s adopted position below. This is, however, not covering all elements of the reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation and the final outcome of the legislative process remains uncertain.Continue Reading Council of the European Union backs reforms to the EU Regulatory Framework for Medicinal Products

On 3 February 2025, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) launched a consultation asking for stakeholders’ views on  draft guideline in relation to the regulation of individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies (Draft Guideline).

The aim of the proposed guideline is to establish a clear and streamlined regulatory pathway to authorisation so that these highly innovative products can be made available to patients quickly, without compromising any assessment of safety. While the primary focus of the Draft Guideline is individualised messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) cancer immunotherapies, MHRA suggests that the regulatory and scientific principles considered might be broadly applicable to other disease indications (including rare diseases) or technologies that could benefit from personalisation or individualisation. It also states that the Draft Guideline will be updated when experience of other technologies (peptides, non-integrative DNA and polymer deliver systems) is available.  

In terms of regulatory assessment of individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies, the Draft Guideline provides clarification of the data which should be included in marketing authorisation (MA) applications and, importantly, confirms that an individualised medicine may, in some circumstances, be granted an MA under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (HMRs), even where the product includes an individualised component tailored to the requirements of a specific patient.

There is currently substantial interest in the use of mRNA technology to develop individualised treatments for cancer. The current consultation is therefore of interest to companies focussing on this and other individualised therapies.Continue Reading The UK’s MHRA launches consultation on draft guideline on individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies

Following the implementation of the Windsor Agreement, a new framework is coming into effect in the new year affecting the UK licensing regime for medicinal products, giving the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) the exclusive authority to licence medicines across the whole of the UK.  The changes to the UK licensing regime will have knock-on effects on the Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) framework. To accommodate for this, The Supplementary Protection Certificates (Amendments Relating to the Windsor Framework) Regulations 2024 (the Windsor Framework SPC Regulations) were laid before Parliament on 31 October 2024 to come into force on 1 January 2025. This will amend the existing assimilated Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 as it applies in the UK.

Although the UK SPC application process will eventually be simplified, the Windsor Framework SPC Regulations insert new definitions and additional provisions, as well as an Annex setting out transitional arrangements to address issues relating to territorial scope, validity, duration, expiry and paediatric extensions.Continue Reading Windsor Agreement changes to UK Assimilated SPC Regulation

We set out in a previous post that the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) intends to introduce a new international recognition procedure (IRP) for medicinal products, whereby decisions taken in certain countries could be recognised by the MHRA to fast-track approval in the UK.

On 30 August 2023, the MHRA published detailed guidance on how it will use the IRP for medicinal products. The IRP will be open to applicants who have already received an authorisation for the same product from one of the MHRA’s specified Reference Regulators (RRs) in Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Switzerland, Singapore and the United States. However, the MHRA retains the right to reject the IRP and conduct a full assessment if considered necessary.

This procedure will operate in parallel to the MHRA’s current national procedures, including the shortened 150-day timetable, offering applicants a range of authorisation routes depending on the status in other countries and type of application. The hope is that this will allow the MHRA to be able to use the decisions in other countries, while still being able to conduct its own assessment where necessary for the UK market.

The IRP will be available from 1 January 2024. However, until the Windsor framework is in place on 1 January 2025, discussed here, products falling within the scope of the EU Centralised Procedure can only be authorised in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales).Continue Reading New UK International Recognition Framework for Medicines

On 26 May 2023, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced plans to introduce new international recognition routes for medicines, whereby the MHRA can recognise decisions to authorise medicinal products taken in other countries so the MHRA can fast track approval in the UK. Further, on 4 July 2023, the MHRA published its Corporate Plan, 2023 to 2026 (Corporate Plan) outlining its four strategic priorities over the next three years, including to “deliver scientific and regulatory excellence through strategic partnerships” through, for example, collaboration with international regulatory partners.

The new international recognition routes will enable recognition of medicinal product approvals in Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Switzerland, Singapore and the United States.

The aim is for these routes to be in place by the first quarter of 2024.Continue Reading New UK International Recognition Routes for Medicines   

Today, 26 April 2023, the European Commission (the Commission) published its long-awaited proposed amendments to the EU regulatory framework for medicinal products (the Proposals). We set out the key takeaways from these Proposals in our Advisory.

This is the culmination of a number of years’ work by the Commission, starting with the new pharmaceutical strategy for Europe (the Strategy) announced on 25 November 2020. We set out a summary of and reasons behind the Strategy in a previous Advisory, noting that the Strategy sought to ensure a high level of public health by increasing the availability, accessibility, and affordability of medicinal products throughout the EU and harmonize the internal market.

To meet these goals, the Commission has proposed substantial changes to the EU regulatory system, via a new Directive that will replace Directive 2001/83 (medicinal products for human use), and a new Regulation that will replace Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (authorization and supervision of medicinal products), Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 (orphan medicinal products), and Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 (pediatric medicines). The Proposals include changes to the regulatory protections available for medicinal products and orphan medicinal products and a new procedure relating to shortages of medicinal products. Continue Reading Proposed Amendments to the EU Regulatory Framework for Medicinal Products

In September 2021, we posted about the European Commission’s implementation of its new pharmaceutical strategy (which was also discussed in more detail in our posts on the strategy, proposed amendments to orphan and paediatric legislation and the industry response). Readers will be aware that the focus of the Strategy is on the availability, accessibility and affordability of medicinal products, based on the view that current incentive models do not provide an adequate solution for unmet medical needs or appropriately incentivise investment in innovation. As part of its work on the revision of the EU pharmaceutical legislation, the European Commission launched a public consultation to seek views on the current framework and on some of the proposals for changes in order to support the European Commission’s impact assessment for the revision of the legislation.

Following this consultation, the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) published an article entitled “Back Innovation, Boost Access” with its response to the EU pharmaceutical strategy consultations and some of the concerns raised by the Commission. This expresses EFPIA’s position that innovation is only meaningful if patients have access to it, but highlights that access is not always in the control of the pharmaceutical companies. It also describes the current status of access to medicines in the EU Member States, some of the reasons for the delays to access and EFPIA’s proposals to improve patient access to innovative medicines.Continue Reading EFPIA’s Response to EU Pharmaceutical Strategy Consultations

As we have previously reported, under the Northern Ireland Protocol of the Withdrawal Agreement between the EU and UK, Northern Ireland (“NI”) has continued to follow the EU rules after the end of the transitional period. In contrast, Great Britain (“GB”) now has a freestanding independent regulatory regime. This means that there are two sets of rules that apply in the UK, and this has led to difficulties with medicines, and other products, moving from GB to NI (the route by which the majority of products reach the market in NI).

In December 2020, the European Commission published a notice that allowed certain flexibilities to be in place through 2021 to ensure there were no medicine shortages in NI (as well as other territories historically dependent on medicines supply through GB). As 2021 concluded, industry – and patients – had been concerned that no long-term solution had been found.

After protracted negotiations, on 17 December 2021, the European Commission put forward proposals to ensure the continued undisrupted supply of medicines from GB to NI. The proposals seek to ensure that patients in NI will have access to life-saving medicines at the same time as patients in the rest of the UK. These proposals also allow time to put in place long-term solutions for the supply of products to NI, and time for industry to adapt to future regulatory requirements and changes.

In parallel, legislation changes have been made in the UK, and the MHRA guidance has been, and is being, updated to reflect the proposals, although they are not yet formally adopted by the EU legislative bodies. Further, the MHRA has stated that there is a reporting obligation on industry to notify the MHRA if the flexibilities applicable to NI will not be used.Continue Reading Brexit update: Supply of Medicines from Great Britain to Northern Ireland

Earlier this month, the European Commission published an updated version of the 2011 Note on the handling of duplicate marketing authorisation applications for medicinal products (the 2011 Note). Following a long period of consultation and exchange with stakeholders and representatives from the EU Member States, the European Commission has sought to clarify the conditions under which applications for duplicate marketing authorisations will be assessed. In this blog post, we discuss the relevant changes, as well as the implications for the industry.
Continue Reading European Commission publishes updated guidance for duplicate marketing authorisations