Marketing Authorisation

Subscribe to Marketing Authorisation via RSS

On 23 October 2025, Advocate General (“AG”) Emiliou delivered his opinion in Case C-118/24: Laboratoires Eurogenerics and Theramex France.[1]

The AG opines on three key questions regarding the use of the decentralised procedure for generic medicinal products:

(i) The national courts of the EU Member States are allowed by EU law to judicially review the legality of a marketing authorisation (“MA”) granted via the decentralised abridged procedure where it is alleged that the medicinal product in question does not meet the criteria of a generic medicinal product. This is applies even if the judicial review is conducted by a national court in an EU Member State other that the reference Member State for the decentralised marketing authorisation procedure.

(ii) The applicant seeking such judicial review does not need to be the marketing authorisation holder for the reference medicinal product or the applicant for the generic marketing authorisation. The applicant could also be a third party with a vested interest, such as the marketing authorisation holder for a biosimilar medicinal product which will be competing with the newly authorised generic medicinal product. This conclusion by the AG remains unaffected by the fact that such applicant  may not be admissible if the action was brought at EU level to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) if the direct and individual concern of the applicant is not demonstrated. According to the AG, it is for the EU Member States in the framework of their procedural autonomy to decide whether a right to challenge an MA exists in these circumstances.

(iii) Chemically synthesised products are not precluded from meeting the criteria to be a generic of a reference biological medicinal product.

This third finding will, if followed by the CJEU, also apply to the centralised marketing authorisation procedure and arguably facilitate market access for synthetic copies of biological medicinal products. It would mean that, in practice, applicants for generics of biological medicinal products would not be required to submit additional pre-clinical and/or clinical data (as opposed to biosimilar applicants) and may potentially benefit, once authorised, from more advantageous pricing and reimbursement conditions (e.g., substitutability at pharmacy level which may not be available for biosimilar medicinal products).Continue Reading Can a chemically synthesised medicine be authorised as a generic of a biological medicine? And who can challenge this?

On 10 October 2025, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) announced the early launch of the “Aligned Pathway”. This is a joint initiative designed to streamline  the scheduling of the regulatory approval and health technology assessment processes in order to reduce the time before a new medicine is available on the NHS following the grant of the marketing authorisation (MA). The pathway supports the UK Government’s ambitions outlined in the 10-Year Health Plan for England and the Life Sciences Sector Plan to accelerate access to medicines and reduce regulatory burden, as discussed in our blog here.Continue Reading MHRA and NICE launch aligned approvals pathway

Introduction

On 4 June, EU Member States, meeting in the Council of the European Union (‘Council’), have agreed on a position on the pharmaceutical reform package.

This agreement was reached despite significant divergences between EU Member States in the preceding weeks. It marks a key milestone in the process for adoption of the EU revision of EU’s general pharmaceutical legislation, as it sets out the Council’s position for the trilogue negotiations to find a text agreeable to the Parliament and the Council, which can now begin.

The innovative pharmaceutical industry will welcome aspects of the Council’s adopted negotiating mandate as it provides greater certainty with regards to regulatory data protection and it lightens some of the obligations introduced in the European Commission proposal for reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation adopted in April 2023 and the European Parliament’s position adopted on 10 April 2024 (see our detailed advisory). At the same time, the Council has adopted positions on some aspects of the proposals that could be seen as less favourable to industry.

We discuss some of the key provisions and changes in the Council’s adopted position below. This is, however, not covering all elements of the reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation and the final outcome of the legislative process remains uncertain.Continue Reading Council of the European Union backs reforms to the EU Regulatory Framework for Medicinal Products

On 3 February 2025, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) launched a consultation asking for stakeholders’ views on  draft guideline in relation to the regulation of individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies (Draft Guideline).

The aim of the proposed guideline is to establish a clear and streamlined regulatory pathway to authorisation so that these highly innovative products can be made available to patients quickly, without compromising any assessment of safety. While the primary focus of the Draft Guideline is individualised messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) cancer immunotherapies, MHRA suggests that the regulatory and scientific principles considered might be broadly applicable to other disease indications (including rare diseases) or technologies that could benefit from personalisation or individualisation. It also states that the Draft Guideline will be updated when experience of other technologies (peptides, non-integrative DNA and polymer deliver systems) is available.  

In terms of regulatory assessment of individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies, the Draft Guideline provides clarification of the data which should be included in marketing authorisation (MA) applications and, importantly, confirms that an individualised medicine may, in some circumstances, be granted an MA under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (HMRs), even where the product includes an individualised component tailored to the requirements of a specific patient.

There is currently substantial interest in the use of mRNA technology to develop individualised treatments for cancer. The current consultation is therefore of interest to companies focussing on this and other individualised therapies.Continue Reading The UK’s MHRA launches consultation on draft guideline on individualised mRNA cancer immunotherapies

On January 1, 2025, new UK-wide arrangements for the supply of medicines came into effect on account of the “Windsor Framework.” The overarching aim is to secure the long-term stability of the supply of medicines to Northern Ireland (NI), ensuring that medicines will be available at the same time, and on the same basis, across…

Following the implementation of the Windsor Agreement, a new framework is coming into effect in the new year affecting the UK licensing regime for medicinal products, giving the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) the exclusive authority to licence medicines across the whole of the UK.  The changes to the UK licensing regime will have knock-on effects on the Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) framework. To accommodate for this, The Supplementary Protection Certificates (Amendments Relating to the Windsor Framework) Regulations 2024 (the Windsor Framework SPC Regulations) were laid before Parliament on 31 October 2024 to come into force on 1 January 2025. This will amend the existing assimilated Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 as it applies in the UK.

Although the UK SPC application process will eventually be simplified, the Windsor Framework SPC Regulations insert new definitions and additional provisions, as well as an Annex setting out transitional arrangements to address issues relating to territorial scope, validity, duration, expiry and paediatric extensions.Continue Reading Windsor Agreement changes to UK Assimilated SPC Regulation

On 20 March, the Commission proposed several measures intending to boost technology and biomanufacturing in the EU, including the Commission Communication Building the future with nature: Boosting Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing in the EU; and Questions & Answers on the Commission Communication.

The Communication, while directed towards the broader biotech sector, refers to the aim to have a resilient EU biotech ecosystem to safeguard the supply of innovative and generic medicines. It recognizes the significance of vaccine and mRNA technology research for cancer, cardiovascular infectious, and rare diseases, as well as the role of AI in personalized healthcare and diagnostics, including generative AI for medicines discovery and complex genetic diseases.

At the same time, it acknowledges the challenges found in the biotech sector in the EU due to complex regulatory obstacles both nationally and at EU level; or the uncertainty over the return of their investments. Continue Reading Commission Communication on biotechnology and biomanufacturing

On 11 March, the European Commission adopted the proposal for a Delegated Regulation to amend Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 as regards the examination of variations to the terms of marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1701 of 11 March 2024. The amendments will apply from 1 January 2025.

Scientific and technological advancements have led to a rise in the number of requests for variations to marketing authorisations (MA) and have brought the need to revise the variations procedure to make it more efficient and adaptable to change, in particular in relation to biological medicinal products, vaccines and medical devices.

The proposal aims to make the variations procedure simpler, clearer and more flexible to be able to respond to scientific and technological progress, and to reduce administrative burden.Continue Reading European Commission proposal to amend the Variation Regulation for Medicines

On 24 October 2023, the European Commission published a Communication on “Addressing medicine shortages in the EU” (the Communication). The Communication responds to the European Council’s call in June for urgent measures to ensure production and availability of critical medicines (i.e., the unavailability of which may cause patients serious harm, and whose supply must be ensured even in crisis periods) and to diversify international supply chains. On the same date, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published details on the Solidarity Mechanism, recently created by the EMA Medicines Shortages Steering Group (MSSG) to facilitate redistribution of medicines between Member States (MS) in cases of critical shortages (i.e., medicine shortages where no alternative is available).

These EU-level actions are in addition to the mechanisms to tackle shortages already included in the European Commission’s proposal for a reform of the EU Pharmaceutical Legislation (read our advisory).Continue Reading New EU-level actions addressing shortages

In September 2023, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) relaunched its Policy 0070 on publication of clinical data for medicinal products for human use (the Policy). The Policy, as discussed in previous posts, is one of the Agency’s flagship public health initiatives focused on promoting the transparency of both EMA decision-making and clinical data, sharing of knowledge and use in future research.

While the Policy was adopted by the EMA back in 2014, it has been suspended since 2018 due to the EMA’s relocation to Amsterdam and COVID-19. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the EMA adopted exceptional transparency measures for centrally approved COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. This was deemed a success further showing the need for clinical data sharing and, thus, the need  for relaunching the Policy.Continue Reading EMA relaunches Policy 0070 on publication of clinical data for medicinal products for human use